Robotic-assisted range of motion therapy on limb muscle tone in chronic stroke patients: A systematic review

Authors

  • Nasim Nasim Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Desiyani Nani Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Endang Triyanto Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33024/minh.v7i6.471

Keywords:

Muscular Tone, Range of Motion, Robotic Intervention, Stroke Patient

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a sudden neurological deficit that arises from vascular damage in the central nervous system, which can lead to disabilities, particularly affecting the movement capabilities of those impacted. While often associated with older adults, the occurrence of stroke in younger individuals has risen in recent years. The disabilities that result from strokes in younger adults can contribute to economic challenges and a reduced quality of life. To mitigate the functional limitations caused by stroke, interventions such as Robotic Range of Motion (ROM) can be utilized, taking advantage of technological advancements. Robotic ROM techniques can improve muscle tone in the limbs, and it is anticipated that consistent ROM interventions will effectively alleviate movement restrictions in these areas.Top of FormBottom of Form

Purpose: To identify robotic-assisted range of motion therapy on limb muscle tone in chronic stroke patients.

Method: A systematic review approach in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles were sourced from online databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. The review was organized according to the PICOS framework. In this article, the PICOS criteria were defined as follows: P: Stroke patients, I: Range of Motion (ROM) exercises using robotics, C: Inclusion of a control group, O: Improvement in muscle tone, S: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). The keywords used in the search included “range of motion,” “robotic intervention,” “muscular tone,” and “stroke patient.” Articles were selected based on specific inclusion criteria: publication within the last five years (2019-2024), English language, use of robotics in interventions, focus on stroke patients, application of randomized controlled trial research methods, and availability of the full text.

Results: The literature review of the five journals revealed that Robotic ROM interventions are effective in enhancing muscle tone in stroke patients. This conclusion is backed by clinical evidence gathered from the analysis of these journals.

Conclusion: Based on the analysis of the five articles, it is evident that ROM intervention utilizing robotics through various methods positively affects the extremities of stroke patients.

References

Adomavičienė, A., Daunoravičienė, K., Kubilius, R., Varžaitytė, L., & Raistenskis, J. (2019). Influence of New Technologies on Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System. Medicina, 55(4), 98.

Agusrianto, A., & Rantesigi, N. (2020). Application of Passive Range of Motion (ROM) Exercises to Increase the Strength of the Limb Muscles in Patients with Stroke Cases. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan (JIKA), 2(2), 61-66.

Aprile, I., Guardati, G., Cipollini, V., Papadopoulou, D., Mastrorosa, A., Castelli, L., & Germanotta, M. (2020). Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects with Stroke. An Explorative Study. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, 588285.

Aprile, I., Germanotta, M., Cruciani, A., Loreti, S., Pecchioli, C., Cecchi, F., & Carrozza, M. C. (2020). Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 44(1), 3-14.

Budhota, A., Chua, K. S., Hussain, A., Kager, S., Cherpin, A., Contu, S., & Campolo, D. (2021). Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Training Post Stroke: A Randomized Control Trial Using Combinatory Approach Toward Reducing Workforce Demands. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 622014.

Coscia, M., Wessel, M. J., Chaudary, U., Millán, J. D. R., Micera, S., Guggisberg, A., & Hummel, F. C. (2019). Neurotechnology-Aided Interventions for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation in Severe Chronic Stroke. Brain, 142(8), 2182-2197.

Cherpin, A., Kager, S., Budhota, A., Contu, S., Vishwanath, D., Kuah, C. W., & Campolo, D. (2019, June). A Preliminary Study on the Relationship Between Proprioceptive Deficits and Motor Functions in Chronic Stroke Patients. In 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (pp. 465-470). IEEE.

Cho, J. E., Lee, W. H., Shin, J. H., & Kim, H. (2021). Effects of Bi-Axial Ankle Strengthening On Muscle Co-Contraction During Gait in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Gait & Posture, 87, 177-183.

Dehem, S., Gilliaux, M., Stoquart, G., Detrembleur, C., Jacquemin, G., Palumbo, S., & Lejeune, T. (2019). Effectiveness of Upper-Limb Robotic-Assisted Therapy in The Early Rehabilitation Phase After Stroke: A Single-Blind, Randomised, Controlled Trial. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 62(5), 313-320.

Iwamoto, Y., Imura, T., Suzukawa, T., Fukuyama, H., Ishii, T., Taki, S., & Araki, O. (2019). Combination of Exoskeletal Upper Limb Robot and Occupational Therapy Improve Activities of Daily Living Function in Acute Stroke Patients. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 28(7), 2018-2025.

Kager, S., Hussain, A., Cherpin, A., Melendez-Calderon, A., Takagi, A., Endo, S., & Campolo, D. (2019, June). The Effect of Skill Level Matching in Dyadic Interaction on Learning of a Tracing Task. In 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (pp. 824-829). IEEE.

Liu, Y., Song, Q., Li, C., Guan, X., & Ji, L. (2020). Quantitative Assessment of Motor Function for Patients with a Stroke by an End‐Effector Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot. BioMed research international, 2020(1), 5425741.

Lodha, N., Patel, P., Casamento-Moran, A., Hays, E., Poisson, S. N., & Christou, E. A. (2019). Strength or Motor Control: What Matters in High-Functioning Stroke?. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 1160.

Mahendrakrisna, D., Windriya, D. P., & GTS, A. C. (2019). Karakteristik Pasien Stroke Usia Muda di RSUD Kota Surakarta. Cermin Dunia Kedokteran, 46(3), 167-170.

Mehrholz, J., Pollock, A., Pohl, M., Kugler, J., & Elsner, B. (2020). Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Robotic-Assisted Arm Training for Improving Activities of Daily Living and Upper Limb Function After Stroke. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 17, 1-14.

Paolucci, T., Agostini, F., Mangone, M., Bernetti, A., Pezzi, L., Liotti, V., & Saggini, R. (2021). Robotic Rehabilitation for End-Effector Device and Botulinum Toxin in Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Chronic Post-Stroke Patients: An Integrated Rehabilitative Approach. Neurological Sciences, 1-11.

Rodgers, H., Bosomworth, H., Krebs, H. I., Van Wijck, F., Howel, D., Wilson, N., & Shaw, L. (2019). Robot Assisted Training for The Upper Limb After Stroke (RATULS): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet, 394(10192), 51-62.

Taravati, S., Capaci, K., Uzumcugil, H., & Tanigor, G. (2022). Evaluation of an Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation Program On Motor Functions, Quality of Life, Cognition, and Emotional Status in Patients with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study. Neurological Sciences, 1-12.

Tunik, T. (2023). Kepatuhan Penderita Stroke Yang Mengalami Imobilisasi Terhadap Caregiver dan Tatalaksana Stroke di Rumah. Healthy: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan, 2(2), 134-143.

Wall, A., Borg, J., Vreede, K., & Palmcrantz, S. (2020). A Randomized Controlled Study Incorporating an Electromechanical Gait Machine, The Hybrid Assistive Limb, in Gait Training of Patients with Severe Limitations in Walking in The Subacute Phase After Stroke. Plos One, 15(2), E0229707.

Published

2024-08-19

How to Cite

Nasim, N., Nani, D., & Triyanto, E. (2024). Robotic-assisted range of motion therapy on limb muscle tone in chronic stroke patients: A systematic review. Malahayati International Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 7(6), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.33024/minh.v7i6.471